| What Brain Research Does (and Doesn’t ) Tell Us About Learning
 THERE IS LITTLE AGREEMENT about how
the human brain functions. In fact, says brain
researcher Michael Gazzaniga, “If we ever
learned how the brain learns to pick up a
pencil, it would represent a major achievement.”
Thus, while my role in Seattle Pacific
University’s Brain Center for Applied Learning
Research is to explore the connections
between brain science and the world of education,
there is a challenge. I reluctantly
believe that brain science has very little to
say at this time to the world of education. 
                
                  |  (Click image to enlarge.)
 
 
 |  |  Given this perspective, is there any point
to a Brain Center for Applied Learning
Research? Although we don’t know much
about how the brain actually learns, I do
believe robust theoretical common ground
exists between the investigative brain sciences (especially the so-called cognitive
neurosciences) and the world of education
— as long as there is also room for a powerful
sense of boundaries. Even if the brain data were mature, most
  brain scientists have never taught 30 fourth
  graders in a typical American classroom, half
  of whose parents are getting a divorce, and
  a quarter of whom are on some form of psychoactive
  medication. Most educators do not
  know how to run noninvasive imaging equipment,
  or navigate their way through the subtleties
  of brain development at the cellular
  level. Yet, if we assume that education is at
  its fundamentals about brain development,
  these differing skill sets are hardly incompatible.
  Rather, they are complementary — and,
  from a research point of view, especially if
  you are interested in end-use results, could
  create a potent scientific force.   This, of course, suggests that brain professionals
  and education professionals
  conduct research together. And that is the
  whole point of The Brain Center at SPU: 
  to describe a slice of biology where such
  collaborative research projects might yield
  prescriptive insights. Altogether, I have identified
  12 such slices, which I sometimes
  refer to as “brain rules.” These simply
  denote basic things we know about the brain
  that could form the nucleus of research projects,
  which one day might be capable of
  improving American education — if brain
  scientists and education scientists choose
  to integrate their worlds. By John Medina
  Director of the
  Seattle Pacific
  university Brain
  Center for Applied
  Learning Research   
  
  
  
  
   
 Back to the topBack to Home
 |